Econ Bite-Size

A Ducky Inflation

May 26, 2015

|

Economind

 

This short cartoon depicts a monetary phenomenon known as "Inflation". Inflation is basically the decrease in the value of money or the increase in the value of goods and services.

There are different types of inflation, but in align with the content of the cartoon, we will look at the simplest form of inflation. It is bound to occur when the central bank prints too much money, exceeding the rate of production growth. Thus, having too much money within the economy is not always a good thing. Why?

 

Because you don't eat money. Money is not an end, but a means to attain various goods and services to fulfill your wants and needs.

 

Think of a free market economy where the only product available is apple. Let's assume that we have 1000 apples at $1 each. In that imaginary economy, assume we have 1000 people, each is bestowed with $1. This implies that everyone only has an apple to consume because each person only has $1 available. But, what if suddenly everyone is given $1 more (thus, end up with $2 at hand). 


This increases their purchasing power, and you might think that it allows people to buy 2 apples. But, the truth remains that we only have 1000 apples. So, with competition among consumers, it is not possible for 1 person to buy 2 apples. Why? Because if that is the case, 500 people will get 2 apples and the other 500 will end up having worthless $2. No sane person is willing to save useless $2 and starve oneself. Remember, apple is the only product available in that economy. For this reason, everyone will end up competing for apple, bidding up its price until they can no longer do so. The price will eventually, given time, end up at $2 per apple.

 

In the end, giving people additional dollar does not make them any better off, not when the amount of real economic output (apple) remains the same at 1000. Everyone will still end up being able to buy only 1 apple.

 

This is, my friends, why printing money (or, in fancy economic term, QE or Quantitative Easing) can be harmful if not carried out with precaution. For the same reason, it is exactly why people don't use rocks or leaves as money (because there are countless of them everywhere, thus eroding their purchasing power to almost nothing if used as money). Think of having to pay a million rocks for a candy. Ouch!

 

Well, that's all folks. I think, to have Walt Disney going all the way of making a Donald Duck cartoon about inflation, economics must have been a sexy topic even back then. It will only get sexier as time passes!

Tags:

Economics

inflation

Econ Bite-Size

Please reload

Follow Us

Science and Technology as support for Sustainable Development

August 26, 2018

India's Demonetization and Unified Payment Interface: A bold move

June 19, 2018

De-dollarization: Not so soon

June 10, 2018

The Economics of Poverty: Taking a step back (Part 2.1)

November 28, 2017

Is Economic Modelling a futile attempt before the everlasting Uncertainty?

November 23, 2017

The Newton and Einstein of Economics: Keynes vs. Lucas

June 26, 2017

A Short Email to An Inspired Student

June 21, 2017

The Economics of Poverty: Taking a step back (Part 1.1)

June 16, 2017

The Economics of Poverty: Taking a step back (Part I)

February 1, 2017

Economind on Philosophy

January 19, 2017

Please reload

Recent Posts

India's Demonetization and Unified Payment Interface: A bold move

June 19, 2018

Is Economic Modelling a futile attempt before the everlasting Uncertainty?

November 23, 2017

Science and Technology as support for Sustainable Development

August 26, 2018

1/5
Please reload

Featured Posts
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square
To get started with Disqus head to the Settings panel.

© 2017 by Economind

  • Home

  • EconArticles

  • EconPeople

  • EconVids

  • EconForum

  • About

  • More

    ECONOMIND

    Think Economics